From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5554 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2006 23:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5547 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2006 23:19:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (HELO mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net) (204.127.131.115) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:19:16 +0000 Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-68-165-190-143.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[68.165.190.143]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <200606282319141110050abne>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:19:14 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: ssh and SYSTEM Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <002901c69b09$4386da80$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060628215435.GD20940@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 > From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:55 PM > To: cygwin-talk at > Subject: Re: ssh and SYSTEM > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:50:42PM -0700, L Anderson wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 04:50:26PM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > >> > >>>I am running WinXP SP2 > >>> > >>>I installed openssh and followed the instructions at > >>>http://pigtail.net/LRP/printsrv/cygwin-sshd.html on how to install. > >> > >> > >>Nicholas Fong (nfong@xxxxxxxx.xxx) is the person > responsible for those > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Perhaps a new Cygwin acronym is in order--something like: > > > >PDPSHFIYR--Please Don't Put Spam Harvester Food In Your Replies. > > Of course, it may just be that I meant to do that, too... > > cgf ??? You are intentionally violating your own rules of the cygwin-at list now? To what possible constructive end? Hmm. Well at least you replied to the correct list this time. -- Gary R. Van Sickle