From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-2690-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 7558 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2006 18:02:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 7548 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2006 18:02:08 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:05 +0100
Received: from mail.artimi.com ([192.168.1.3]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:03 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.1.165]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:03 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'going home soon'" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Rsync over ssh (pulling from Cygwin to Linux) stalls..
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <006e01c6bfcb$bf22c0f0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <ebqdat$isb$2@sea.gmane.org>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2

On 14 August 2006 18:54, mwoehlke wrote:

> mwoehlke wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On 14 August 2006 17:04, mwoehlke wrote:
>>>   It's time we took this discussion to the licensing list, so if
>>> anyone wants
>>> to carry it on please take note of the "Reply-To" header that I have set.
>>> ... [ ... rest of message safely ignored - TITTLL! ... ]
>> 
>> Ack, gmane doesn't carry that. For now, at least, I'm taking your other
>> suggestion and TITTTLing. Besides which I think my comment is more -talk
>> than -licensing :-).
> 
> Ack, misread that (don't think I've seem TITT*L*L before to notice the
> distinction, and it *is* a little hard to see without looking close :-)).

  Heh.  Now you're wondering: did I /mean/ for that to happen?
 
> Plus, it's not on the http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#OLOCA! ;-)

  Perhaps we should add a wildcard entry: TITT?L.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....