From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3432 invoked by alias); 15 May 2009 21:43:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3423 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2009 21:43:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nihxway2out.hub.nih.gov (HELO nihxway2out.hub.nih.gov) (128.231.90.110) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 21:43:31 +0000 X-IronPortListener: Outbound_SMTP Received: from nihcessmtp.hub.nih.gov ([128.231.90.115]) by nihxway2out.hub.nih.gov with ESMTP; 15 May 2009 17:43:28 -0400 Received: from NIHHT01.nih.gov ([156.40.71.20]) by NIHCESSMTP.hub.nih.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 15 May 2009 17:43:28 -0400 Received: from NIHMLBX02.nih.gov ([156.40.71.32]) by NIHHT01.nih.gov ([156.40.71.20]) with mapi; Fri, 15 May 2009 17:43:28 -0400 From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" To: "'cygwin-talk@cygwin.com'" Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:43:00 -0000 Subject: RE: Please use either "sourceware.org" or (when possible) "cygwin.com" in announcement messages Message-ID: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A2A4000493@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> References: <20090515191250.GA26949@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <21kr05h9aevj3vl0mlthgom9qrfds15nv8@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <21kr05h9aevj3vl0mlthgom9qrfds15nv8@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Andrew Schulman wrote on Friday, May 15, 2009 4:28 PM: > Since this is something that probably every person wonders about who > ever posts to cygwin-announce, perhaps it would be useful for you to > restate the reason, say, once a year or so, on, oh, I don't know, > maybe May 15. No doubt there is a good reason, but I don't recall > ever learning what it is. Thanks, Andrew.=20=20=20 As long as we're considering May, how about May 25? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towel_Day