From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-2797-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 4587 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2006 15:45:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 4570 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2006 15:45:52 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:45:49 +0000
Received: from mail.artimi.com ([192.168.1.3]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:45:46 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.1.165]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:45:46 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'TGI The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List'" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Rsync over ssh (pulling from Cygwin to Linux) stalls..
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <011501c6c2dd$5edfbd00$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <ec4l54$9aq$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2

On 18 August 2006 16:08, mwoehlke wrote:

> Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 18 August 2006 15:26, mwoehlke wrote:
>>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> On 18 August 2006 14:31, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
>>>>> Can anyone from RedHat acknowledge that this arrangement
>>>>> would be acceptable to them? If so, that would potentially
>>>>> open the door to any public domain code.
>>>>   I don't suppose for one second that the RedHat legal team are actually
>>>> reading this newgroup. 
>>>> 
>>>>   *sip*
>>>> 
>>>>   :-)
>>> Yeeeeeaah, that was my thought :-)
>>> 
>>> To answer the question, though, that's the whole point of making a
>>> trivial change. My understanding
>> 
>>   *sip*
> 
> Was that because I answered the question, or because of the implied
> "IANAL, but..."? ;-)

  Yes!

> 
>>> is you can copyright that trivial
>>> change, which then covers the entire work, with the exception that the
>>> original PD version is still PD.
>> 
>>   Why wouldn't it just cover the trivial change then?
> 
> It does, and it doesn't, or so I understand. 

  *sip*

> Copyright law is funny that
> way. :-) Do you *really* want me to attempt an explanation, or have you
> had enough to drink already?

  No, and no!

>>> Hmm, is there a list legal<AT>redhat<DOT>com? ;-)
>> 
>>   Dunno.  You could always give it a try.  If what you get back has a
>> disclaimer more than thirty times as big as the message body, you'll know
>> you've reached a lawyer.
> 
> ...and I'll be drunk, according to the latest rule. ;-)

  Hooray!

  Well, it is Friday afternoon, after all.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....