From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-4515-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 7329 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2008 17:00:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 7318 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2008 17:00:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:59:59 +0000
Received: from ALBATROSS ([192.168.1.150]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:59:56 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'The No! Not this one! The previous one! and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List'" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
References:  <loom.20080904T183156-413@post.gmane.org> <48C0316C.F9E434A9@dessent.net> <00fc01c90f39$f4006970$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>  <loom.20080910T172329-77@post.gmane.org> <007101c9136b$a62b3e10$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>  <loom.20080910T174541-80@post.gmane.org> <007c01c91372$1c48c3a0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <5E25AF06EFB9EA4A87C19BC98F5C8753016D87EE@core-email.int.ascribe.com> <gabfo8$rrf$1@ger.gmane.org> <014a01c9142c$eb129570$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <gabi99$5qg$1@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: RE: setup.exe --quiet-mode
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <014b01c9142f$d0d7c5b0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <gabi99$5qg$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin-talk.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

Matthew Woehlke wrote on 11 September 2008 17:51:

> Dave Korn wrote:

>>   It was only ever true for Win95 and early versions of Win98.  All
>> NT-series OSs count time in units of 100ns using a 64-bit long long. 
>> Which won't run out any time soon....
> 
> Aww, you don't think a Windows box will manage an uptime of 29,227,102
> years? ;-)

  Well, I don't think it'll manage it any time *soon* ... but when it does
happen, <see previous From: line, after allowing for 22-vs-29 typo>.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....