public inbox for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'isn't this where we came in?'" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: A biento
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <022801c682fe$078f3e50$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <908763.1148883921095.JavaMail.bwehr@mac.com>

On 29 May 2006 07:25, bruce@wehrhere wrote:

> A biento, mes amis.  I bid you farewell ... for now.  :)
> 
> You folks have been helpful, informative and downright entertaining.  I've
> got other work to do, so I'm signing off the list for the time being.  If
> you need me (oh, for, let's say ... a rousing creation/evolution debate
> <poke poke> :), you know where to find me:  bruce AT wehrhere DOT com.  (or
> Captain DOT Kangaroo AT mac DOT com ... seriously!  :).    
>
> <>< Bruce

  Heeyy waitaminnit!  I was just getting good and charged up for that one!  After all, I don't believe in evolution every week.
This week, we all got here by evolution, sure enough, but if tomorrow the FSM decides that ID makes more sense, or even just for a
whim[*], he'll just reach out his noodly appendage and re-undo-ify the entire universe so that it was, in fact, created only fifteen
minutes ago, with all those fake fossils buried in the rocks and the fake memories in our heads and all that, and not only will it
be that way but it'll always have been that way.

  Then, next day, he might decide he prefers an evolutionary universe, and change it all back again.  And it'll always have been
that way, too.

  So OK, here's your starter for five (strands of spaghetti):  Just because Michael Behe is a scientist does not automatically make
everything he does science.  'Irreducible complexity' is a fallacious concept that simply has not been shown to be the case.  It is
a blatantly false inference to claim that a complex molecular system that cannot function without any given part could not have
evolved.  But, because this is just a starter, I'm not going to tell you straight away where the exact hole in the reasoning is: I
want to know if you can see it.


    cheers,
  <>< DaveK
  /|\

[*] - The FSM moves in mysterious ways.  And sometimes entirely flippant ones.  RAmen!
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-29  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29  6:25 bruce@wehrhere.com
2006-05-29  9:03 ` Dave Korn [this message]
2006-05-30  4:16   ` Igor Peshansky
2006-05-30  9:33     ` Dave Korn
2006-05-30 15:10       ` Igor Peshansky
2006-05-30 18:58         ` Joe Smith
2006-05-30 19:33           ` Igor Peshansky
2006-05-29 14:24 bruce@wehrhere.com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='022801c682fe$078f3e50$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM' \
    --to=dave.korn@artimi.com \
    --cc=cygwin-talk@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).