public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cyg Simple" <>
To: "'The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List'"
Subject: RE: Vim wins again. :)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04ac01d0c302$0b61e3e0$2225aba0$> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

> From: Stephen John Smoogen
> On 17 July 2015 at 11:45, Warren Young <> wrote:
> > On Jul 17, 2015, at 6:00 AM, Eric Blake <> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/08/2015 02:00 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thoughts from the other editor geeks here?
> >>
> >> You should know better than to provoke editor wars :)
> >
> > I was hoping for thoughtful commentary instead, like your answer. :)
> Then you should have worded your original question better. Pithy questions get
> pithy answers.
> What exactly do you want to hear from people that isn't something that has
> been said since 1986 USENET multiple multiple times.. Emacs does X better than
> vi? vi does Y better than emacs? In the end, it is really about what you the user
> find better for how your brain works. So you can't really know that unless you
> spend a month in each editor trying to see which one works better for your
> brain. If notepad++ is what works best for you then what does it matter that
> someone else uses emacs or vi or atom?

And then enters the shell command line editor.  One of the first things I do besides set the erase character is to set -o vi.

IDE editors are another source of contention.  Some allow for external process for the editor while others do not.  As Stephen says it is all a matter of preference of which color the bike shed is.  Some like red, others like blue and still others like green and yellow.  That said a comparison of choice doesn't matter and is a waste of publishing ink except that some like Warren love to hear about it and encourages that ink.  None the less my choice is over others is gvim, vim, vi or whatever is available if those are not.

cyg Simple

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 20:01 Warren Young
2015-07-17 12:00 ` Eric Blake
2015-07-17 17:45   ` Warren Young
2015-07-17 18:12     ` Stephen John Smoogen
2015-07-20 15:37       ` cyg Simple [this message]
2015-07-22 14:01         ` Robert Pendell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='04ac01d0c302$0b61e3e0$2225aba0$' \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).