From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-2031-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 21931 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2006 10:15:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 21922 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2006 10:15:19 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:15:17 +0000
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.1.165]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:15:13 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "Thread TITTTL'd!" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: The 20060324/20060326 snapshots hang on testcase
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <04f001c65250$80c87540$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <000a01c6522a$7c016c90$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2

On 28 March 2006 06:43, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

  Oi Gary!  This thread needs TITTTL'ing!

>> From: Dave Korn
>> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:00 AM
>> To: cygwin@cygwin
>> Subject: RE: The 20060324/20060326 snapshots hang on testcase
>> 
>> On 27 March 2006 04:04, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>> 
>>> The newest 20060324/20060326 snapshots started to hang on the
>>> following testcase. Note, I only tried the following versions:
>>> 
>>> release 1.5.19     no hang
>>> snapshot 20060306  no hang
>>> snapshot 20060324  hangs
>>> snapshot 20060326  hangs
>> 
>>   CVS 20060317: no hang.
>> 
>> [ Just to help refine the search a bit. ]
>> 
> 
> Ahem, without resolution to the minute that's going to help how again?
> 

  Why would you need resolution to the minute unless someone was making
changes in /src/winsup equally frequently?  I had a data point that was
handily in between the 6th and the 24th, in fact it was more or less a binary
chop of the range that had still to be reduced and halved it!


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....