* RE: -fno-inline -O1 breaks ntohs()
@ 2006-09-18 23:05 Eric Blake
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2006-09-18 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-talk
> ! #if defined __OPTIMIZE__ && !defined __NO_NOINLINE__
Cool - a triple negative - makes reading the code oh so fun! Too
bad Danny had to cut it back to just a double negative in his followup.
I still remember how confused I used to get with hardware designers'
negative logic, where low voltage means asserted. But enough years
of practice, and now I too get accused of throwing in too many
inversions into my code. After all, POSIX standardized on NDEBUG
being defined as the key to disable assertions :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-09-18 3:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-18 23:05 -fno-inline -O1 breaks ntohs() Eric Blake
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).