From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2463 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 09:12:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Received: (qmail 2438 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2005 09:11:50 -0000 Received: from pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (207.69.195.62) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:11:50 +0000 Received: from user-2inieqa.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.59.74] helo=efn.org) by pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1Dd2mo-0001Du-00 for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Tue, 31 May 2005 05:11:47 -0400 Received: by efn.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 31 May 2005 02:11:46 -0700 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:16:00 -0000 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Message-ID: <20050531091145.GA2900@efn.org> References: <20050531034845.C15911703A4@samwise.efn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050531034845.C15911703A4@samwise.efn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:48:30PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > IMO there should be a link to this message from > > http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM. > > > Comments? > > Well, since Chris just invited me to this list for, I assume, some sort of > "flame-off", I do have one comment. Chris has already apologized for the > very behavior he's defending in this meandering "manifesto". So, if it > belongs anywhere (and it doesn't), it belongs under the acronym "CGF", > perhaps as a hyperlink titled "rationalization of his singular behavior". I don't think you understand what cgf was apologizing about. And I'm not sure where you get the "manifesto" or "rationalization" from. I thought it was neat that he could summarize so well his tendency to direct people toward acting in their own best interests, which is what is jokingly referred to as being "mean". I understand that you don't get the joke, but do you have to show so repetitively that you don't get it?