From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31982 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 04:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Received: (qmail 31963 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2005 04:59:08 -0000 Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (HELO mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net) (204.127.131.115) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:59:08 +0000 Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-68-165-41-183.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[68.165.41.183]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2005053105002011100osb47e>; Tue, 31 May 2005 05:00:21 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:12:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20050531091200.sIlEzLZtKxeGfmaBNM5zew0pVWBbgzMVhNMKbdvQDbc@z> > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:14:53PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >- Are you trying to start some sort of "flame-off" here, Chris? I can't say > >I'm real interested in participating. If on the other hand this is a cry > >for help, I would of course be happy to do what I can. > > You're so funny. Are you the victim now? > > cgf Ok Chris, ok, you got me to temporarily subscribe to cygwin-talk. Two more things: - You didn't respond to my second question. - "Are you the victim now?". No, Chris, I'm not a victim. What do you believe you are a victim of? And a third thing: - Yes, I am a pretty funny guy. But there's nothing comical about your habitual anti-social behavior, nor your attempts to rationalize it to yourself, nor is there anything insincere about my offers of assistance. Oh, and I guess there's a fourth thing as well: - You didn't respond to my first question either: are you trying to start some sort of "flame-off" here? If not, what are you trying to do here? -- Gary R. Van Sickle