From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6281 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 16:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Received: (qmail 6163 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2005 16:16:18 -0000 Received: from c-66-30-17-189.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:16:18 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 1388D13CA7E; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:16:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:53:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Message-ID: <20050531161615.GD3750@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves References: <20050531045912.409FE13C9D9@cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050531045912.409FE13C9D9@cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:59:05PM -0500, Gary Van R. Sickle wrote: >- You didn't respond to my second question. Nope. You're right. I'm going for a personal best in the "Get GVRS to make repeated observations" category. I'll consider any demands that I answer about whether I'm going to single you out for special treatment or entice you into a "flame-off" as a point. Just another ten messages to go before I get the new record! I also have a couple of wagers running on your funny "I know you are but what am I" responses. Please don't let me down there. cgf