From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21179 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 23:39:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Received: (qmail 21137 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2005 23:39:07 -0000 Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (HELO mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net) (204.127.131.117) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:39:07 +0000 Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-68-165-41-183.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[68.165.41.183]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <2005053123402011300q0v5qe>; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:40:20 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: "'Talk Amongst Yourselves'" Subject: RE: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:02:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050531213812.GC9672@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20050601000200.qLqAZaFCiVbTSqE3DIwrItoYzMD04eq8OsCrbqYLNp0@z> > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:38 PM > To: Talk Amongst Yourselves > Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:21:39PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com > >> [mailto:cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of > Christopher Faylor > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 3:15 PM > >> To: Talk Amongst Yourselves > >> Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) > >> > >> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:47:01PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >> >Sorry Chris, I guess I'm going to have to, since that > sort of thing > >> >tends to be more your maturity level. > >> > >> Well, then, you're just a poopie head, aren't you? > > > >...and with that, Chris was able to once again avoid dealing > with his > >behavioral problem. > > You got that right. Imagine what would happen if we were to > get too deeply into my behavioral problems. Better yet, imagine what would happen if you suddenly decided to behave in a mature and at least semi-professional manner. > My bed wetting > might return and then I'd have to add my wife's name to the > 99.99% of the people in the cygwin community who hate my guts. > I think that one's called a "persecution complex". Nobody in the Cygwin community hates you Chris. I certainly don't. I just want you to behave yourself, much like any sixth-grader is able and expected to do. > You know I'd expect a lot more sympathy from someone who was > sincerely trying to help... > You expect sympathy, but refuse to give any? Interesting. > Btw, I think that's #2 for the term "behavioral problems". > We're currently stalled at 5 for the term "flame-off". > Does counting the number of times I use particular terms or phrases somehow help you cope with your issues, Chris? This seems very similar to how you were (are?) so enamored with the number of hours between the time somebody posted a question and the time I posted a response. How deep does this obsession with the minutiae of my posting habits go Chris? Perhaps it would help if you wrote some scripts to automate such tedious bookkeeping. With that work off your plate, you'd have a lot more time to devote to worthwhile endeavors, such as figuring out what's broke in there and fixing it. > cgf -- Gary R. Van Sickle