From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16016 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2005 08:55:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Received: (qmail 15961 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2005 08:55:48 -0000 Received: from pop-scotia.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO pop-scotia.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (207.69.195.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:55:48 +0000 Received: from user-2iniekb.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.58.139] helo=efn.org) by pop-scotia.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1DdP0M-00006T-00 for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 04:55:15 -0400 Received: by efn.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:55:16 -0700 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:00:00 -0000 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: Talk Amongst Yourselves Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Message-ID: <20050601085515.GB2716@efn.org> References: <20050531204238.GB3328@efn.org> <20050601001618.641C8170217@samwise.efn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050601001618.641C8170217@samwise.efn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:15:48PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:58:14PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > [summary: blather blather] > > > > Whatever. > > > > Touche. That's the spirit! > > > But the topic of this sub-thread here is OCLA hyperlinks. > > What do you > > > think of my idea that this really belongs as a link under > > the "CGF" heading? > > > > I think it doesn't fit there; that's why I suggested WJM. > > Something like: > > > > > > What mean means. > > "WJM" has little to do with Chris' antisocial behavior nor his > rationalizations of it. Again, should you read Chris' rant, you'll find > that it is nothing more than that. He admits as much himself: > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2005-q2/msg00287.html Where on earth in that message do you see any such thing? Snip stuff about "antisocial behavior", "flip out on you", "rationalize". I think I've figured it out; perhaps you just don't realize that email doesn't contain the overtones possible in speech, so you are taking the bare words others write and imagining up all kinds of stuff to distort their simple meaning. There was no flip out. There was no rant. Really. They exist only in your mind.