From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31353 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2005 03:49:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List Received: (qmail 31341 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2005 03:49:49 -0000 Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (HELO mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net) (204.127.131.115) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:49:49 +0000 Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-68-165-41-183.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[68.165.41.183]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2005060203510311100oske5e>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 03:51:03 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:56:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <429E7C39.8000303@hq.astra.ph> X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20050602035600.IzzJIfjgC9bQ3Jkv-nDf1B73xuPq6tg6BJTzeml400A@z> Carlo Florendo wrote: > > Can't you teach your mailer to behave? > http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > This has been told to you, IIRC, many times. > Carlos, the list's own email adresses themselves are of little use to a harvester, since, if they are going to be harvesting from a list, they sort of by definition already have the list's own address. And if they didn't already have it, they'd get it from here: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2005-q2/. However, I'll get rid of them just this once per your request (though of course I can't remove it from that web page, making such an action fairly meaningless). So don't say I never did nothin' for ya. [snip] > > > >In his latest statement on the topic, > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2005-q2/msg00279.html, he mentions > >nothing about "fun". > > > > Yes, he doesn't. QED. [snip] > > > >Nobody is discussing such posts, not me anyway. Why do you > and some others > >(one other?) believe any of this chronic issue is related to > pointing people > >to web pages? I truly don't follow. > > > > > > > > You know why? Because it's fun. :) > > And it helps people to help themselves. If you don't > understand that, I > can't imagine what you can? > I think I've just been maligned. -- Gary R. Van Sickle