From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-959-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 10219 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2005 15:17:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 10186 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2005 15:17:25 -0000
Received: from c-66-30-17-189.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:17:25 +0000
Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id 5AA6113C097; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 11:17:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:00:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
Message-ID: <20050602151724.GA5603@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
References: <429E7D0B.4090601@hq.astra.ph> <20050602035615.48B4213C08A@cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050602035615.48B4213C08A@cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:56:10PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>Why are you so obsessed with my obsession with cgf's behavior?  ;-)

And, I think that says it all.

Creepy isn't it?  Brrr....

cgf