From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-1004-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 19351 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2005 19:38:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 19338 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2005 19:38:30 -0000
Received: from pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (207.69.195.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:38:30 +0000
Received: from user-2inifes.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.61.220] helo=efn.org)
	by pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
	id 1Dg6Ng-0002qm-00
	for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:38:29 -0400
Received: by efn.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:38:30 -0700
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:55:00 -0000
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna@efn.org>
To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Assembler problem while trying to integrate D iompiler in GCC suite
Message-ID: <20050608193829.GA3848@efn.org>
References: <SERRANOD6XMLDthODt900000323@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0506080950260.4945@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0506080950260.4945@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:51:22AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
> > ----Original Message----
> > >From: Gerrit P. Haase
> > >Sent: 07 June 2005 22:12
> >
> > >
> > > Given the magic which is included in creating binaries that computers
> > > can understand and do s.th. that the binaries want the computer to do,
> > > this is a valid idea.  Or what do you really think is the difference ,
> > > whether an assembler label starts with A,B or C or even L?
> >
> >   Starting with an 'L' makes it a local label in gas, doesn't it?
> >
> >   AAAAAARRGH!  I MADE AN ON-TOPIC POAST TO THE HIPPOLIST!?!?!?!?!?!
> 
> Starting with an 'H' makes it a hippo label in gas, doesn't it? [*]

PLEASE stop using the terms hippo and gas together; it fair gives one
the shivers.