From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25920 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2006 03:35:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 25912 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2006 03:35:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zipcon.net (HELO zipcon.net) (209.221.136.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:35:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 21731 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2006 19:28:55 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO efn.org) (209.221.136.22) by mail.zipcon.net with SMTP; 2 Feb 2006 19:28:55 -0800 Received: by efn.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:28:48 -0800 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:35:00 -0000 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mismatched dll Message-ID: <20060203032847.GB4036@efn.org> References: <020220062158.387.43E28079000ACE870000018322007507440A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> <20060203013712.GC17485@brasko.net> <20060203013842.GB7678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060203014352.GD17485@brasko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060203014352.GD17485@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:43:52PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:38:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: > > >>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package > > >>as part of the official cygwin distribution. Then you just point > > >>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's > > >>problem instead of yours. > > > > > >OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are > > >partially wrong. > > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is > > >not a good alternative. > > > > I retract my veto. If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have > > no objections. > > Well, I suppose > > "anything in computer science is [possible], if you are willing to write > the code and wait long enough"? We clearly have someone here who has caught on to the spirit of cygwin.