From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22662 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2006 19:35:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 22643 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2006 19:35:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:35:24 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id CA52A13C0F8; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:35:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin, huh?, wha? [RE: Pbm with ar.h when compiling make-3.80 for mingw] Message-ID: <20060215193522.GA22587@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List References: <20060215192647.GJ4169@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <006d01c63266$70f18fd0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006d01c63266$70f18fd0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:31:38PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 15 February 2006 19:27, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Thanks, Dave, for your continued vigilance. >> >>Is there something (besides hippos) in the water or something? We seem >>to be getting an increased number of non-cygwin "problem reports" >>recently. > > >Yeh, I've noticed, the situation looks real bad. > >In fact you might even say it mings! I wonder if it would matters at all if we just got rid of the -mno-cygwin option entirely. I don't mind making a mingw "cross-compiler" part of the requirement for building cygwin and maybe it would make the issue really clear. cgf