From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11959 invoked by alias); 9 May 2006 07:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 11929 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2006 07:07:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zipcon.net (HELO zipcon.net) (209.221.136.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:06:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 24949 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 00:12:11 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO efn.org) (209.221.136.37) by mail.zipcon.net with SMTP; 9 May 2006 00:12:11 -0700 Received: by efn.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 9 May 2006 00:06:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:07:00 -0000 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List Subject: Re: FW: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot Message-ID: <20060509070656.GB2864@efn.org> References: <003101c66e12$a1becaa0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20060502181157.GG23863@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060502181157.GG23863@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:11:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > > --- > > ! ! > > I've sent Dave some private email about this. For the record, I would > rather not see this type of thing in this list. I rather agree. But (and this is a serious question) would it have been ok if he'd put the artwork on the web and posted a link to it? If so, why is there a difference? And if not, is that any different from posting a link like http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/~dm/remove.pdf ?