From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26351 invoked by alias); 24 May 2006 18:11:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 26266 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2006 18:11:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-19.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 18:11:27 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 6735613C01F; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:11:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin, gdb and SEH [was RE: 1.5.19: changes have broken Qt3] Message-ID: <20060524181125.GC29596@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <44748613.9000005@freenet.de> <052c01c67f5c$c9dab430$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <052c01c67f5c$c9dab430$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 07:06:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >You appear to be under the same misunderstanding as the guy from >yesterday who thought cygwin might have a use for "market research". >There is no company, no support team, and any developers whose >employers might assign them to work on anything related to cygwin are >under no obligation to work on other people's problems. I had email problems yesterday (multiple spamd's using up lots of memory and CPU) so I may have missed the "market research" email. Anyone have a pointer? My blood pressure is dangerously low today and probably needs a boost. Or was this the person who was using the time-honored "Cygwin will be much more popular if you allow people to discuss Interix" technique? cgf