From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7572 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2006 02:15:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 7563 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2006 02:15:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-197.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:15:34 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id B10D213C01F; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:15:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List Subject: Re: ssh and SYSTEM Message-ID: <20060629021532.GA31911@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List References: <20060629005703.GI20940@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <003101c69b19$f650dca0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003101c69b19$f650dca0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00456.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:18:42PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> From: Christopher Faylor >> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 7:57 PM >> To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List >> Subject: Re: ssh and SYSTEM >> >>I'd be interested in hearing the opinions of the sane members of this >>>>mailing list. >> >>On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:50:16PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>>1. Sane members? Now you *are* posting to the wrong list. 2. Seem >>>that if you're soliciting permission from the Cygwin community to start >>>editing the cygwin-at mailing list archives, you should be asking for >>>it on that self-same list, and most certainly not >>on a list >>>that primarily concerns itself with the discussion of hippopotomi. >> >>Wait, so, I was on-topic when I moved here but now I have to go back to >>the cygwin list to stay on-topic? > >So you're just as confused as the rest of us about what the mailing >list rules are, to whom they apply, and to what degree? Oh dear! Wow. I should have remembered that you don't follow these things and been clearer. I actually was expressing incredulity at your inability to maintain consistency within the span of two email messages. Anyway, I really do have the right to ask for opinions from whomever I see fit and I clearly asked for the opinions of the subset of cygwin users in this mailing list. But, yes, I know. You don't follow. And, undoubtedly you have an audience of one who greatly enjoys petulant, confused observations about what's appropriate for which mailing list so you will be not following for the foreseeable future. We all get that by now. cgf