From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-3094-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 15086 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 01:28:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 15076 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 01:28:09 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-71-248-179-54.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.54)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:28:08 +0000
Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 676E813D48E; Wed,  1 Nov 2006 20:28:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:28:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Cygintl-3.dll was not found
Message-ID: <20061102012806.GD10468@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
References: <5718434.post@talk.nabble.com> <7022170.post@talk.nabble.com> <7042419.post@talk.nabble.com> <20061028055933.GA19517@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <7065394.post@talk.nabble.com> <20061029221805.GA1057@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <7106666.post@talk.nabble.com> <20061101221317.GA3677@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <7124473.post@talk.nabble.com> <eibbjl$f18$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eibbjl$f18$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:45:54PM -0700, Cary Jamison wrote:
>infoterror wrote:
>>I'm sorry you're having a tantrum.  For those of us with a background
>>in logical argument, what's happened here is obvious and typical.
>>We're speaking different languages, and you've made no effort to
>>understand what I'm saying because you take it as a personal insult
>>that someone dare suggest your project could use some additions.  This
>>is all-too typical in IT.  Good luck in your quest for maturity and
>>logical coherence.
>
>Wow, sure seems like a lot of ad hominem directed towards cgf in all
>this 'logical' argument!
>
>Next, he'll be spouting some ad hippoem, then watch out for the revenge
>of the hippos!

I guess I just can't talk to logicians.  They are out of my league.

cgf