From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22279 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2008 23:27:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 22271 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2008 23:27:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-72-74-94-250.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.250) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:26:28 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id B725869C023; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:26:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:27:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Subject: Re: 'bug' in Unsub-instructions included with 'cygwin-announce' messages. Message-ID: <20080318232626.GB22446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List References: <47E04A13.1010208@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47E04A13.1010208@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:02:43PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > It has the unsub address line as: > cygwin-announce-unsubscribe-you=3D3Dyourdomain.com@cygwin.com > > I think it should be: > cygwin-announce-unsubscribe-you=yourdomain.com@cygwin.com > > But I could be confused? > > I'm probably confused about where to post this, as it isn't really > an announcement and I don't think cygwin-announce is the proper place > to announce cygwin-announce related problems. > > It's likely the list owners wouldn't really care to receive this type > of email on a 'personal' level, so personal email is of suspect > validity. > > And it's not exactly a cygwin issue, since it is really about > cygwin list, which makes it more of a 'meta issue', but there > is no cygwin-meta list, exactly...though talk might be considered > meta in a meta sorta way. > > I dunnow -- maybe I'll just ask on cygwin-talk and see what others > say, since I know all the hip(po) type people hang there and maybe > the problem will be solved (or at least berated, or I will...or something). > > Eh? What this other says is that you're confused about how this works. The unsubscribe instructions are put there by the individuals who send email to the mailing list. If there was a typo in the instructions, it was just a typo and not a symptom of a bad mailing list setting. cgf