Just a test....

Just a test....

[Václav Haisman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Move along, there is nothing to see here.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
==================================================================================================================================

- --
VH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIHro5jksRtmO2spcRCG+WAJsH98d/3MsXRatNHeBmOQzS9zIF/QCbBn8u
BzsLNYXITaBm/vBN/AgKaJw=
=mesL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: Just a test....

[Dave Korn]

Václav Haisman wrote on 05 May 2008 08:42:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Move along, there is nothing to see here.

  But hang on, I could have sworn I heard somebody screa-       

>
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA


    QUICK, CALL THE COPS, HE'S MURDERING SOMEONE IN THERE!

    SEAL THE EXITS!!   DON'T LET HIM GET AWAY!


 <loudhailer> WE KNOW YOU'RE IN THERE
              DO NOT HARM WHOEVER YOU HAVE IN THERE
              LEAVE THEM ALONE 
              THROW DOWN YOUR HIPPOS
              COME OUT WITH YOUR HANDS UP </loudhailer>


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: Just a test....

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:41:46AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Move along, there is nothing to see here.
> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
> ==================================================================================================================================

I've really never understood why anyone would think it's ok to send
something like this to hundreds of people.  If you are planning on
sending a message to the list then send a message to the list.  If you
don't have anything to send right now then there shouldn't be any
urgency in figuring out if your email is working.  There isn't any
reason to send a content-free message.

"Test" email is basically just spam.  You're not selling anything but
you are sending email to a bunch of people for no other reason than to
satisfy your (apparent) personal curiousity about whether you are able
to send email or whether sourceware is able to receive your email.  That
is definitely not what this list is for.

There is, however, a list called "test-list" at sourceware where this
kind of thing is ok.  If you really feel the need to send test email
here then please use that.

cgf

Re: Just a test....

[Václav Haisman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1879 bytes --]

Christopher Faylor wrote, On 6.5.2008 15:10:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:41:46AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Move along, there is nothing to see here.
>> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>> ==================================================================================================================================
> 
> I've really never understood why anyone would think it's ok to send
> something like this to hundreds of people.  If you are planning on
> sending a message to the list then send a message to the list.  If you
> don't have anything to send right now then there shouldn't be any
> urgency in figuring out if your email is working.  There isn't any
> reason to send a content-free message.
> 
> "Test" email is basically just spam.  You're not selling anything but
> you are sending email to a bunch of people for no other reason than to
> satisfy your (apparent) personal curiousity about whether you are able
> to send email or whether sourceware is able to receive your email.  That
> is definitely not what this list is for.
The sourceware server mailing list software keeps mangling my emails, 
rendering my PGP signatures invalid. I figured it might help if I didn't send 
emails using PGP/MIME. The As and =s in the email were supposed to trigger 
the problem. (Though when I thinkg about it now I think it should have been 
spaces instead.)

> 
> There is, however, a list called "test-list" at sourceware where this
I do not see any such list listed on <http://sourceware.org/lists.html>. Is 
there any other relevant mailing lists list where I should have looked?

> kind of thing is ok.  If you really feel the need to send test email
> here then please use that.
> 
> cgf

--
VH


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 258 bytes --]

Re: Just a test....

[Václav Haisman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Václav Haisman wrote, On 6.5.2008 21:11:
| The sourceware server mailing list software keeps mangling my emails,
| rendering my PGP signatures invalid. I figured it might help if I didn't
Like this.

| send emails using PGP/MIME. The As and =s in the email were supposed to
| trigger the problem. (Though when I thinkg about it now I think it
| should have been spaces instead.)
|

- --
VH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkggrmEACgkQoUFWwtEPkHLMGACeKa2t+aJZ7sEaq8256CLLJvoV
EYUAn0pNuMKi2iVF5834UbiMzSOZ/Mn9
=Iy/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Just a test....

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:11:44PM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote, On 6.5.2008 15:10:
>The sourceware server mailing list software keeps mangling my emails,
>rendering my PGP signatures invalid.  I figured it might help if I
>didn't send emails using PGP/MIME.  The As and =s in the email were
>supposed to trigger the problem.  (Though when I thinkg about it now I
>think it should have been spaces instead.)

This isn't even tangentially related to cygwin.

>>There is, however, a list called "test-list" at sourceware where this
>I do not see any such list listed on
><http://sourceware.org/lists.html>.  Is there any other relevant
>mailing lists list where I should have looked?

I didn't say it was listed there and I didn't imply that you should have
known about this.  I was just trying to point you to a place where you
could experiment.

cgf