From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11241 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2008 03:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 11228 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2008 03:16:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-72-93-245-44.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (72.93.245.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:16:06 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BD313C027 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 9DD8010005; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:16:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Subject: Re: Removing the hippo Message-ID: <20081007031556.GA9188@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List References: <48E9BB48.6070602@alcatel-lucent.it> <04c201c927a6$6fc2edb0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20081006150207.GB11858@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <04fa01c927c7$a1d36250$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20081006153054.GA12086@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <003801c927e7$e42e54a0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20081007011550.GC10584@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <37336.97.113.119.24.1223348142.squirrel@webmail.efn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37336.97.113.119.24.1223348142.squirrel@webmail.efn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:55:42PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >On Mon, October 6, 2008 6:15 pm, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:15:27PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Is that still even allowed these days? I thought congress was about to >>>pass another one of those online decency protection acts... >> >>You know that's actually kind of tasteless, even for this mailing list. > >Mailing list? I thought this was a Nabble board. Just to take this even further from the realm of on-topicness, I just noted that Nabble now has a New! Nabble2. The excitement is tangible. (I say this knowing full well that I'm feeding Dave another straight line) cgf