From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25801 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2009 20:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 25792 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2009 20:06:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-96-233-71-199.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (96.233.71.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:06:50 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D26A13C028 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:06:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 1D03D2B35E; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:06:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:06:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Subject: Re: cmd.exe from Cygwin Message-ID: <20090107200637.GA13424@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List References: <4962DE56.6040007@cygwin.com> <5195c8760901052113i531a01eeucd7e7aa0f36c8dc3@mail.gmail.com> <5195c8760901060035x2743936axd05b108055404d45@mail.gmail.com> <49639969.40707@cygwin.com> <49639A90.8020702@cygwin.com> <5195c8760901062114r6ba086a1v2f6bac5ee1ed1538@mail.gmail.com> <49644792.2030607@cygwin.com> <5195c8760901070019y58d4f3a4l266950475001f21b@mail.gmail.com> <20090107155217.GB32231@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4965054E.1090806@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4965054E.1090806@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:41:02AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>screen uses ptys. ptys are equivalent to CYGWIN=tty. We really don't >>guarantee that pure Windows applications will work with ptys. > >Aw gee...but you overcome worse limitations in windows... I figured >'walk-on-air' was the next logical step after you got the >'walk-on-water' syscall to work... I actually vaguely discussed a way to do this fairly recently in the mintty thread. cgf