From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25797 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 15:35:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25786 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 15:35:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-98-110-183-121.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:35:47 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEDB3B0008 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:35:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 15B7D2BD26; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:35:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel Message-ID: <20090626153538.GF30070@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <690f5ac90906260819j4a977530if44a82324eddc229@mail.gmail.com> <20090626152445.GP30864@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090626152445.GP30864@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote: >>Couldn't find anything on this: >> >>Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one could >>ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same time. Of >>course on ssh would have to run on a different port. How would one >>setup this? > >Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022. And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the clock to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented. Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue. cgf