From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19929 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2009 01:48:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19922 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2009 01:48:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-98-110-183-121.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:48:19 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ACF3B0008 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:48:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 54D1616913; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:48:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:48:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: fresh 1.7, bash fails with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION Message-ID: <20090706014808.GA3799@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <4A51008E.9050205@verizon.net> <4A51553C.3080406@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A51553C.3080406@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:37:00AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Vincent R. wrote: >>bash 3.2.49-22 OK >>libreadline6 5.2.14-12 OK >>libreadline7 6.0.3-1 OK > >Jerry DeLisle wrote: > >>bash 3.2.49-22 >>libreadline6 5.2.14-12 >>libreadline7 6.0.3-1 > >Err, ok. So you've got the working versions. So why do you think >you're getting the same bug at all? > >Surely this *has* to be some entirely different issue than the one >that's breaking a version of bash that you aren't using on a version of >windows that you aren't using? Personally, I blame binutils. There was always something not-quite-right about those programs. For instance, I don't like the way they objectify some source code. If the programs weren't running on a PC, I'd say they were definitely non-PC. cgf