From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-4830-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 26132 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2009 14:21:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 26119 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2009 14:21:09 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-173-76-42-77.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.42.77)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:20:06 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA58E3B0002 	for <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:19:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id B62382B352; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:19:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:21:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] su  (goldstar)
Message-ID: <20091120141955.GC18289@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
References: <op.u3nunr1t5o90vo@orion>  <31b7d2790911191346g53aafad3w8a4196fc2cc0a859@mail.gmail.com>  <20091119215258.GB14033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <he4gnd$j94$1@ger.gmane.org>  <20091120004015.GA14403@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin-talk.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>On 11/19/2009 05:40 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>>Sometimes no is exactly the right answer.
>>It's a fun way of answering a Yes/No question and I've done it
>>countless times myself.  The recipient of the "No" *usually* finds more
>>explanation and, more importantly, alternate ways of doing things more
>>useful.
>*Emphasis above (and below) mine*
>
>Ergo *sometimes* no is exactly the right answer.  This is exactly what
>I said.  Glad you agree with me.

Redirected to cygwin-talk.

Please don't continue the discussion here.

cgf