From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22716 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2010 17:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 22701 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2010 17:13:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-58-83.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.58.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:13:38 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB9C13C0C7 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:13:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id D74282B35A; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:13:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:13:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug: cygport fails when the working directory pathname contains spaces Message-ID: <20100127171328.GA30386@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <4B5FA03C.8020504@monai.ca> <4B5FC41E.6090301@users.sourceforge.net> <4B5FD16E.4060107@monai.ca> <4B5FF5AE.3050904@users.sourceforge.net> <4B600397.8030505@users.sourceforge.net> <20100127161844.GA29928@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B26372C0@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B26372C0@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:30:16AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >Christopher Faylor sent the following at Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:19 AM >>And, the most important point here is that what Yaakov does isn't a >>"job". It's a volunteer effort. A gift. He can decide what he does >>or doesn't do and insisting that he isn't doing his job because he >>doesn't want to perform a pointless exercise seems rather rude to me. > >Actually, I'm a little disappointed. I don't recall "WJM" being used >in a response for quite a while now. Indeed, it had fallen so fall off >my radar screen that the other day I forgot to use it when it should >have been part of a post. > >Please. Let's not let this cygwin tradition be abandoned. You're right! I thought I used it recently but I can't find it anywhere. Of course, I couldn't have used it in this context. That would have been up to Yaakov. gf