From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6543 invoked by alias); 31 May 2010 17:02:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 6456 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2010 17:02:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-55-5.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.55.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:02:29 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05D913C061 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id AC6902B352; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 17:02:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: "TakeoffGW" Message-ID: <20100531170224.GG18315@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <4C03BD54.4030801@cwilson.fastmail.fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C03BD54.4030801@cwilson.fastmail.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:44:52AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >On 5/31/2010 8:43 AM, Andy Koppe wrote: >> Yay, another Cygwin 1.3.3 (aka MSYS) distribution, this time using >> Cygwin's latest setup.exe: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/takeoffgw > >So far, it's only a fork of setup.exe. It doesn't actually include any >installable components. Looking at the patches, the "mirror.lst" points to: >http://takeoffgw.sourceforge.net/R0/ -- which doesn't exist, and >ftp://localhost/takeoffgw/ > >I think "pier11" neglected to test his new brainchild on a different >computer... It looks like "pier11" also neglected to understand the GPL since only patches are provided and no the actual source code. Anyone feel like telling him/her? Hmm. Does sourceforge have a method for reporting GPL violations? cgf