From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12465 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2010 03:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 12458 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2010 03:34:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-48-4.bstnma.east.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.48.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:34:38 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id C348113C061 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:34:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id BFD362B352; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:34:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:34:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Moving Cygwin directory safe? Message-ID: <20100628033436.GA15202@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <20100626141016.GD3672@wladimir> <3710255202.20100627051050@mtu-net.ru> <20100627095521.GI3672@wladimir> <20100627133726.GA5344@wladimir> <4C27826E.8020909@monai.ca> <20100627173112.GB5344@wladimir> <87d3vcuwu2.fsf@gmail.com> <20100627190646.GE13357@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87eifs9rwz.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eifs9rwz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:50:04PM +0100, Paul Bibbings wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: > >> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:58:13PM +0100, Paul Bibbings wrote: >>>Michael Ludwig writes: >>> >>> > >> I appreciate that you've moved to cygwin-talk but this does not qualify >> as something which is even remotely related to Cygwin in any way. Please >> don't discuss sports here. > >You set the rules. Football, not OK. > >"Bacon factory fire," OK. "Missing link found," OK ... To put a finer point on it: telling everyone how much you like a sports team, potentially starting an incredibly boring discussion about sports: not ok. Sending something humorous for others to share: ok. But, FYI, if I thought that cygwin-talk could get bogged down in a discussion about bacon fires then I'd step in there too.