From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25764 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2010 14:51:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 25754 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2010 14:51:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:51:42 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id F2B3F6D42F4; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:51:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:51:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: rebaseall [1.7]: cyggcc_s-1.dll error Message-ID: <20100629145137.GM8163@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <1277822045.12015.1382454075@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4C2A04C9.5000202@redhat.com> <20100629144014.GA25176@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100629144014.GA25176@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On Jun 29 10:40, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >On 06/29/2010 08:34 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: > >> Eric Blake wrote: > >>> Phooey. dash now depends on cyggcc_s-1.dll, so rebaseall needs to be > >>> taught to add this library to the list of exemptions (similar to > >>> cygwin1.dll). > >> > >> Or dash could be rebuilt using -static-libgcc. It's not like dash needs > >> to worry about throwing C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries, and if > >> dash is meant to be a /bin/sh implementation (even if cygwin still uses > >> bash for that), then IMO it ought to be -- insofar as is possible -- > >> statically linked. > > > >OK, I'm now trying to figure out how to add -static-libgcc into my > >cygport file. Look for an updated dash later today... > > In the meantime, you might want to consider linking dash with -static-libgcc. There's a good chance that Eric will have bad dreams about hundreds of tiny static libgcc's biting and clawing there way into his house tonight, and all he has for defense is a single gcc4 knife... Corinna