From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2629 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 20:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 2617 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 20:26:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-48-4.bstnma.east.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.48.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:26:50 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B40013C061 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 955312B354; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:26:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug tracker Message-ID: <20100819202648.GC9840@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <4C6D17E0.5010506@blunn.org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi@4ax.com> <20100819141948.GB19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100819144931.GD19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <4C6D559B.4030108@bopp.net> <20100819173439.GC9090@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6D8D33.5070902@bopp.net> <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: >> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the >> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and >> organized. Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at >> this time. > >Bingo. That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra >burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare >time. Why add overhead to a process that already works for me? Feelthy steenking luddite. You're admitting that you're satisfied with mediocrity! You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave. cgf