From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6191 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2010 05:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6138 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2010 05:44:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-45-205.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.45.205) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:43:56 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FF013C061 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id DDF882B354; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:44:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: crossbuild cygwin-1.7.6-1 on linux x64 Message-ID: <20100826054354.GM9152@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <1282736792.3228.ezmlm@cygwin.com> <4C758389.9080608@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20100825211116.GB16178@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C7587AF.5010401@cygwin.com> <4C758B94.4050802@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C758B94.4050802@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:31:00PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >On 08/25/2010 03:14 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin Developers) wrote: >>> I must now have genetic knowledge of building cross-compilers because >>> I don't see why everyone thinks this is such a big deal, requiring so >>> much discussion. >> >> cgf - the cross-compiler compiler. ;-) > >Or, in the WJM vein, > >the cross cross-compiler compiler :) WJC. Hey. A new acronym. We could also say "WC" but I think we could be misinterpreted. cgf