From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-5078-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 5638 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2010 08:30:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 5238 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2010 08:29:31 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:29:27 +0000
Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500)	id 451AA6D4272; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:29:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:30:00 -0000
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin mentioned in "current directory" discussion
Message-ID: <20101116082924.GA26851@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
References: <20101110043738.GA19327@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20101115192609.GA22462@calimero.vinschen.de> <AANLkTimZ0E37W8VkNyzfPSgZt=5Wz9fi4AzqEMXAhh4Y@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimZ0E37W8VkNyzfPSgZt=5Wz9fi4AzqEMXAhh4Y@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin-talk.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

On Nov 15 21:34, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 15 November 2010 19:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov  9 23:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> https://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2010/11/09/10087919.aspx
> >
> > This morning I added a comment to the blog, #42 in the list:
> >[...]
> >
> > Two minutes ago, I found that my comment had been silently removed!
> > I'm not aware that my comment contained offensive, abusive, or
> > disrespectful language.  I'm really wondering why Raymond decided
> > to remove my comment.  This is quite disappointing.
> 
> Perhaps it got swallowed by a COM server that can't deal with a
> disappeared working directory. ;)

Or Raymond fears hippos.


Corinna