From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23998 invoked by alias); 11 May 2011 15:36:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 23926 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2011 15:36:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (HELO nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.230) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:15 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 15:36:15 -0000 Received: from [98.136.185.28] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 15:36:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 15:36:15 -0000 Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@173.76.50.238 with login) by smtp109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 May 2011 08:36:14 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C74A4A801A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Who's using "CYGWIN=tty" and why? Message-ID: <20110511153613.GB19557@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <20110510211800.CCBDF9D5A21@mail2.intersystems.com> <20110511063433.GD28594@calimero.vinschen.de> <4DCAA510.9000909@sidefx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DCAA510.9000909@sidefx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:02:40AM -0400, Edward Lam wrote: >Personally, when I first ran into this problem, I never realized that >CYGWIN=tty would fix it. I did notice that there was a change in the >behavior between Cygwin B20 and the Cygwin 1.X releases but I only >realize now that this was probably the reason. Ding, ding ding! A B20 reference! B20 was da bomb!