From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2398 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 23:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2390 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2011 23:46:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm25-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (HELO nm25-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.213.156) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:45:55 +0000 Received: from [98.139.212.148] by nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jun 2011 23:45:54 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.10] by tm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jun 2011 23:45:54 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp110.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jun 2011 23:45:54 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@108.49.32.211 with login) by smtp110.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2011 16:45:54 -0700 PDT Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A238428052 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:46:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ Message-ID: <20110616234549.GA426@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <20110613153344.GA19880@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <716EA16C9FD24A4CBE13D1A01AAF3747@cit.wayne.edu> <20110614152814.GA3123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4DF79F82.7070205@metaed.com> <4C1F3C3BB7EC455F9FE3D08A28DE58F6@cit.wayne.edu> <4DF7B430.4010508@metaed.com> <20110614192147.GB15316@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209ED1BF935@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209ED1BF935@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:03:57PM -0400, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote on Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:22 PM >> Ok. We're now inexplicably looping back to the beginning >> of the discussion. Please consider this thread officially >> terminated. > >So cygwin-talk is appropriate? > >What about giving both? People could choose what they want or need. > >Might one just add something like line from >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-06/msg00107.html >printf ("Current System Time (UTC): %s\n", asctime (gmtime (&now))); > >Not that I care, but the OP seems to. Still looping: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-06/msg00129.html The OP may care but he hasn't explained why he cares. Without an explanation, I see no reason to pursue a patch to make things work better for him. Please give this a rest. cgf