From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31782 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2011 16:49:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 31760 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2011 16:49:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:49:16 +0000 Received: by wwf5 with SMTP id 5so4797433wwf.2 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.137.13 with SMTP id x13mr10120079wei.52.1319215754476; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (109.Red-79-156-226.staticIP.rima-tde.net. [79.156.226.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fi11sm22804740wbb.9.2011.10.21.09.49.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:49:00 -0000 From: David Sastre To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Proposal to cygwin.com Message-ID: <20111021164911.GB7027@jethro.local.lan> References: <6840379252664234145558@Fresh03-PC> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A311FAEC3@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> <4E9E1536.4090704@gmail.com> <20111019001448.GC20247@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20111019001639.GA23032@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E9F7DE4.2020408@gmail.com> <20111021032605.GA18634@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111021032605.GA18634@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 10558 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:26:05PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:48:20AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >On 19/10/2011 01:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:14:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:09:26AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >>>> On 18/10/2011 14:30, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > >>>>> Jon Clugston sent the following at Monday, October 17, 2011 7:30 PM > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Abigail Cox > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> My name is Abigail Cox and I was wondering if you are interested = in > >>>>>>> exchange links, I'll place your link on my sites exactly here: > >>>>>> What the hell are these e-mails? > >>>>> I think that some web search engines* rank sites based on how many = links to > >>>>> a page are on other web sites. Exchanging links would move one up = the > >>>>> results page. > >>>>> > >>>>> * I believe that Google's original algorithm was based on that - I = don't > >>>>> know what they do now. > >>>>> > >>>>> - Barry Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf o= f NIAID. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> TL;DR: they are spam. > >>>> > >>>> cheers, > >>>> DaveK > >>>> [snip] > >>>> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> <= abigail.cox333@googlemail.com> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> DaveK, > >>> Don't you know our rule about not quoting people's email address in t= he > >>> body of the email message? It's considered to be rude. I'm surprised > >>> you didn't know about it. > >>=20 > >> How embarrassing. I did it myself! > >>=20 > >> cgf > > > > > > Oh, I do apologise. Do you mean I shouldn't have said: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >in my original post? I just wanted to confirm that saying: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >would not be the right thing to do. >=20 > Correct. Thanks for understanding. I just don't want abigail.cox333@goo= glemail.com to > be needlessly spammed thanks to our gaffe. >=20 > cgf After a very hard week, you guys have made me laugh. Really. Thanks! --=20 Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 230 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk6hooYACgkQ95urBFKZ7FbmQgD/deZvnSQdYkvuZPkC/fjULXS0 /bfCkesfBY6VOoEVFkwA/i2ZyjlbTFsgYnz8Xb9gV3W+NJ4vaJmgoeM05kXmx10i =xWHc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--