From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6561 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2012 19:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2012 19:34:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.72) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:33:54 +0000 Received: from pool-108-49-31-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.49.31.235] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjF2o-0007V4-4J for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2579A4296B8 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:33:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19thz6p6+j/9spztaW0kmax Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:34:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: NASA cygwin approach Message-ID: <20120625193353.GC11408@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <4FE6B505.1020705@gmail.com> <4FE89B1B.4040605@etr-usa.com> <20120625191514.GB11408@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4FE8BB84.3040206@etr-usa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FE8BB84.3040206@etr-usa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:27:00PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >On 6/25/2012 1:15 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:08:43AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >>> On 6/24/2012 12:34 AM, marco atzeri wrote: >>>> >>>> Heasoft is a large package but suggesting to install all cygwin >>>> seems a bit too drastic.... >>> >>> Indeed. I hope all those HEASoft users are enjoying their copies of >>> doxygen, gnucap, lilypond, nfrotz, qsf, and sudoku. >>> >>> (Not picking on any Cygwin package maintainers in particular here. I've >>> just randomly cherry-picked some packages unlikely to be of direct use >>> in X-ray astronomy, which seems to be the focus of HEASoft.) >> >> A likely story. I now expect a mass exodus of affronted package >> maintainers. >> >> Thanks a lot. > >You are right as always. As maintainer (in a handwaving sort of way) of >the doxygen package, I am affronted and am, um...nevermind. This is an interesting example of recursive affrontery. You don't often see that in the wild.