From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28046 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2012 14:09:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28035 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2012 14:09:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:09:22 +0000 Received: from pool-108-49-156-82.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.49.156.82] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1THbFp-0001dw-Oz for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:09:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA442800E for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:09:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/bVcXdwn3TeZN1Y+yZAcF+ Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:09:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: include SHA1/MD5 hash/digest of setup.exe, and HTTPS Message-ID: <20120928140920.GA9803@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20ABEABC4B5@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:26:16AM -0400, Mike Marchywka wrote: >can you guys No thanks. And, yes, top-posting is still bad for all of the same reasons. And, *forwarding* email rather than replying to it just exposes you as rather clueless wrt email.