From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6211 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2005 04:57:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Received: (qmail 6185 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2005 04:57:17 -0000 Received: from dessent.net (HELO dessent.net) (66.17.244.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:57:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dessent.net) by dessent.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DqkAM-0000au-OB for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:08:47 +0000 Message-ID: <42CDFD3C.F53B34B@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:57:00 -0000 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Subject: Re: Qestion about Bash Fork Resource Temporily Unavailable for NS2.28 and NS2.27 References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050705223027.08ca8288@pop.prospeed.net> <20050706062832.63358.qmail@web30112.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20050706111849.08d26298@pop.prospeed.net> <20050708032931.GA2392@efn.org> <20050708035619.GC2123@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: -5.3/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * 1.2 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End SpamAssassin results X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > A future project might entail linking cygcheck to email clients, scanning > them for virus scanner attachments and "quarantining" them. We could > also add a "virus scanner" hook for IE which would detect attempts by > users to download rogue virus scanners to their systems. > > If it helps, I could add a cygwin-virus-scanner mailing list devoted to > "first alert" sightings of virus scanners "in the wild". That sounds like a plan. Although I suspect that in six months Symantec or Norton would release a "virus scanner scanner" so bloated with cheesy eye candy and system destabilizing effects that it would set us all back decades. Brian