From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4723 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2006 14:05:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4712 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2006 14:05:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (HELO vms048pub.verizon.net) (206.46.252.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:05:47 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([64.223.212.35]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J3D00FR7J4GAFR6@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:05:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:05:00 -0000 From: "Charles D. Russell" Subject: life expectancy of gcc 3.x To: cygwin-talk cygwin Reply-to: worwor@bellsouth.net Message-id: <44D0B10F.9060808@bellsouth.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 Would anybody venture an educated guess how much longer gcc 3.x (and hence g77) will be supported by cygwin? gfortran does not seem to offer as many options as g77 for managing archaic code (e.g. from netlib).