FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

[Dave Korn]

On 29 August 2006 10:23, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 29 August 2006 09:59, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:

>> 
>> What's wrong? What I miss?
> 
> 
>   Sending your cygcheck output, *as an attachment please*, as described at
> 
>> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> 

  *sip*

    cheersh,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

[Brian Dessent]

Dave Korn wrote:

>   *sip*
> 
>     cheersh,
>       DaveK

If you'll excuse me, I need to go cash my kickback cheque from the
Brewers' Cartel.

Oh, waitaminute...  nevermind.  TINBC!

Re: FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

[mwoehlke]

Brian Dessent wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>>   *sip*
>>
>>     cheersh,
>>       DaveK
> 
> If you'll excuse me, I need to go cash my kickback cheque from the
> Brewers' Cartel.
> 
> Oh, waitaminute...  nevermind.  TINBC!

TINBC? Ok, I'll admit ignorance, but not even *google* knows what 
"TINBC" stands for (at least not if I ask it about "tinbc acronym")

-- 
Matthew
Ncurses. Blessing console programs since 1993.

Re: FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

[Brian Dessent]

mwoehlke wrote:

> TINBC? Ok, I'll admit ignorance, but not even *google* knows what
> "TINBC" stands for (at least not if I ask it about "tinbc acronym")

Variant of <http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/TINLC.html>.

RE: FW: 1.5.21: gcc doesn't compile, make gives simple error

[Dave Korn]

On 29 August 2006 22:38, Brian Dessent wrote:

> mwoehlke wrote:
> 
>> TINBC? Ok, I'll admit ignorance, but not even *google* knows what
>> "TINBC" stands for (at least not if I ask it about "tinbc acronym")
> 
> Variant of <http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/TINLC.html>.


  Hey, there really *is* no lumber cartel!

http://come.to/the.lumber.cartel


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....