patent infringement

patent infringement

[Christopher Faylor]

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e

cgf

Re: patent infringement

[mwoehlke]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e

Lawsuit! Business suit! Hippo suit!

Hmm... Hippopotamus lawyers in business suits... to sue the vile 
infringers! :-)

-- 
Matthew
Now where did I put my hippo?

RE: patent infringement

[Dave Korn]

On 30 August 2006 17:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:

>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F
52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
> 
> cgf

  I don't get what you're saying?  We did GPL the drinking game, didn't we?

  As far as I can see, they're just distributing the sources for a derivative
work....


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: patent infringement

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 30 August 2006 17:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
>
>I don't get what you're saying?  We did GPL the drinking game, didn't
>we?
>
>As far as I can see, they're just distributing the sources for a
>derivative work....

Uh oh.  I now realize that we didn't get anyone to sign the Red Hat
Drinking Game assignment.  The drinking game is GPLed but if you really
want to participate in a nontrivial way, you have to sign the assignment
which disavows Red Hat from any culpability.

Although, hmm.  Maybe there could be a public domain type of drinking
activity which would bypass this requirement.  Surely, this would be
acceptable.

cgf

Re: patent infringement

[Igor Peshansky]

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e

I don't know, the score idea sounds novel and worth adopting... :-)
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

Re: patent infringement

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Aug 30 13:03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >On 30 August 2006 17:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
> >
> >I don't get what you're saying?  We did GPL the drinking game, didn't
> >we?
> >
> >As far as I can see, they're just distributing the sources for a
> >derivative work....
> 
> Uh oh.  I now realize that we didn't get anyone to sign the Red Hat
> Drinking Game assignment.  The drinking game is GPLed but if you really
> want to participate in a nontrivial way, you have to sign the assignment
> which disavows Red Hat from any culpability.
> 
> Although, hmm.  Maybe there could be a public domain type of drinking
> activity which would bypass this requirement.  Surely, this would be
> acceptable.

Nope.  Sign and drink, or don't sign and don't drink.

Of course you can have your sip without signing, but in this case the
trivial drink rule applies (no more than 10 sips).  Otherwise, without
signing Red Hat can't accept your drinking and it would just be a common
booze-up.


Corinna

Re: patent infringement

[Bobby McNulty]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
>
> cgf
>
>   
Did'nt David Korn com up with that game?

sip

RE: patent infringement

[Dave Korn]

On 30 August 2006 19:35, Bobby McNulty wrote:

> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F
52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
>> 
>> cgf
>> 
>> 
> Did'nt David Korn com up with that game?
> 
> sip


  JFTR:  It was Brian who did it, I'm not guilty!

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2006-q3/msg00209.html


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: patent infringement

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:02:17PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 30 August 2006 19:35, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
>>> 
>> Did'nt David Korn com up with that game?
>> 
>> sip
>
>JFTR: It was Brian who did it, I'm not guilty!
>
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2006-q3/msg00209.html

Right.  Brian is to you as Steve Chamberlain is to me.

cgf

Re: patent infringement

[Bobby McNulty]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:02:17PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 30 August 2006 19:35, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>>
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200608.mbox/%3c44F52834.2020207@comcast.net%3e
>>> Did'nt David Korn com up with that game?
>>>
>>> sip
>> JFTR: It was Brian who did it, I'm not guilty!
>>
>> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2006-q3/msg00209.html
> 
> Right.  Brian is to you as Steve Chamberlain is to me.
> 
> cgf
> 

Tghe sip was because I was thirsty and needed a drink.
Better now
Bobby