From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31122 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2009 20:50:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 31115 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2009 20:50:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:50:06 +0000 Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so2768447ewy.2 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.136.15 with SMTP id j15mr4795895ebd.35.1248641404000; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm4963485eyx.53.2009.07.26.13.50.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6CC48A.1060305@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:50:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "The Look Ma! No Firewall! Cygwin-Talk Maiming List" Subject: Re: Zone alarm, you have failed me for the first time... and the last. (BLODA news) References: <4A63E16D.2010503@gmail.com> <4A6C977C.1020401@gmail.com> <4e41f5c20907261245q6808bc74p225a1e2f9529a7bb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4e41f5c20907261245q6808bc74p225a1e2f9529a7bb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 Morgan Gangwere wrote: > Have you tried Komodo? Its got a super-paranoid firewall, but as long > as you remember to check the "let this app through in the future and i > know what the hell i'm doing you tard" button you're good. I would have tried it but according to their website it only runs on Vista and XP. It's starting to get tricky finding a PFW that will still support W2k. BTW, in case anyone's interested, I've been looking at the Matousec leak-testing results list and working downwards: http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php Sunbelt scores pretty badly there. All the best-ranking ones are either on BLODA or not available for 2k, sigh. cheers, DaveK