From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4039 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2010 00:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4024 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2010 00:45:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:45:08 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD0FCE21E for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:45:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:45:06 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (user-0c6sbd2.cable.mindspring.com [24.110.45.162]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 434944B2EBD; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:45:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B53AEFD.7030008@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:45:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: missing setup command line arguments in the FAQ. References: <1263686843.28794.ezmlm@cygwin.com> <4B52D54E.2040909@gmail.com> <4B52EC8E.6050701@netcourrier.com>,<4B5377B7.9010101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Mike Marchywka wrote: > Please, isn't there anyway to keep riff raff off this list? > Catch you on the flip flop. As a former radio amateur myself, > I'm not sure I can convey quite how insulting this is. This is cygwin-talk. It's specifically intended for riff raff and insulting contretemps. (And isn't disdain for those who might confuse ARRL/Ham terminology with the "low-class" Citizen Band radio terminology a bit, err, elitist?) -- Chuck