From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15794 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2010 19:38:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 15787 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2010 19:38:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f211.google.com) (209.85.220.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:37:55 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so5224644fxm.19 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.5.212 with SMTP id 20mr6600446faw.19.1266262673075; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3176881fxm.5.2010.02.15.11.37.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:37:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B79A6B1.3000508@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:38:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "then we do it all again on the way back" Subject: Re: [RFC] Refresh iswblank and iswspace (was Re: Update wctype functions to Unicode 5.2?) References: <20100212205705.GF5683@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100213143809.GM5683@calimero.vinschen.de> <4B783609.90508@gmail.com> <416096c61002141021n1e241aehbdf92b27f53c9afe@mail.gmail.com> <20100215093540.GW5683@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20100215093540.GW5683@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 On 15/02/2010 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 14 18:21, Andy Koppe wrote: >>>> For a start, here are patches to iswblank and iswspace to add the missing >>>> characters U+180e (MONGOLIAN VOWEL SEPARATOR), >>> The sons of the mighty Chinggis do not "separate" their vowels! They sweep >>> down in a mighty horde from the steppe on horseback and cleave them asunder >>> with their swords! >> Yeah, shouldn't that be MONGOLIAN BOWEL SEPARATOR? > > I'm concerned. Do you think that's a bug in Unicode 5.2? Should we > report this upstream? We don't "report" to upstream! We pillage and burn and disembowel our way across Europe to upstream, leaving a trail of grieving orphans and widows in our wake! cheers, DaveK