From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17260 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2010 18:27:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 17242 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2010 18:27:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:27:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so208941fgg.2 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.87.66.29 with SMTP id t29mr170942fgk.49.1267122432372; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm1994074fge.25.2010.02.25.10.27.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:27:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B86C52D.3030207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:27:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: never let common sense stop you from doing something the wrong way if you think it will be more fun Subject: Re: Statically initialising pthread attributes in dynamic dlls. References: <4B848353.2010209@gmail.com> <4B84B08C.7060302@gmail.com> <4B84B887.6070801@gmail.com> <4B856401.2000905@gmail.com> <20100224214459.GA19766@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4B867BBF.4010700@gmail.com> <20100225142135.GP5683@calimero.vinschen.de> <4B868D92.6040209@gmail.com> <20100225144818.GR5683@calimero.vinschen.de> <4B869941.3060809@gmail.com> <20100225152538.GS5683@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20100225152538.GS5683@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On 25/02/2010 15:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 25 15:37, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 25/02/2010 14:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Feb 25 14:47, Dave Korn wrote: >>>> On 25/02/2010 14:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did you test it on Windows Server 2008? >>>> I'm afraid I don't have access to any of the server versions. >>> Heh. >>> >>>>> Btw., if you don't have a Server 2008 machine, just install from >>>>> here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc137233.aspx >>>>> >>>>> Works fine as a VM. Even my Server 2008 domain controller is >>>>> running in a VM. >>>> Hey, thanks! I'll download it and check everything out. More later. >>>> >>> Btw., the evaluation period is 60 days, but you can easily push it to a >>> generous 240 days by re-arming the evaluation period timeout counter: >>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948472 >> Haha, it's in a VM, I can push it to anything I like; like Pascal's >> theoretical evil daemon, or any mad scientist with a brain in a jar, I >> control the horizontal hold, I control the vertical, and, above >> everything else, I control the RTC settings and snapshot/restore process >> ....... > > The other choice is to re-install the test machine every 240 days and use > correct timestamps on shares in the net. But that's not as _evil_ as mind control! > It's just for testing anyway, right? As long as by "testing", you mean "sadistic psychological torture"! cheers, DaveK